Independent civic information • South AfricaEvidence first. Citizens decide.
Our standard

How we verify

The editorial method is designed to make the evidence visible so readers can inspect the reasoning themselves.

1. Define the claim

We separate a checkable factual assertion from opinion, prediction, satire and rhetoric. Political viewpoints are not “fact-checked” merely because they are unpopular.

2. Find the primary source

We look for official documents, original speeches, datasets, legislation, court records, published research or the earliest available version of the media being checked.

3. Cross-check

We compare the primary material with credible independent reporting and specialist sources where appropriate. Dates, geography and context are explicitly checked.

4. Review

A second reviewer checks source quality, whether evidence supports the wording, and whether uncertainty is properly described.

5. Publish with receipts

Each fact-check shows the original claim, finding, key evidence, source links, publication date and review date. Corrections are made visibly rather than by silently changing the result.

6. Independence

SA Truth Guardian does not endorse candidates, parties or political campaigns. Funding, conflicts of interest and material relationships are disclosed publicly.

Our verdicts

Every check carries one of these labels, alongside the evidence and sources behind it.

False The evidence contradicts the claim.Misleading Contains some truth but leaves out context that changes its meaning.Verification guide How to check this kind of claim yourself.
Reference point: South Africa already has public initiatives addressing digital disinformation. Real411 describes a process based on independent, open, transparent and accountable assessment, while the South African Government directs citizens to Real411 and other complaint resources.