Independent civic information • South AfricaEvidence first. Citizens decide.
For citizens. For evidence.

Know what’s verified.
Decide for yourself.

SA Truth Guardian helps people examine viral claims, distinguish evidence from rumours, and find clearly sourced public-interest information. We explain the evidence without telling citizens what political choice to make.

Our editorial rule: show the claim, evidence, sources, reasoning, review date and any meaningful uncertainty.
SA Truth Guardian — protecting voters from misinformation
01Claim identified
02Evidence checked
03Review published
Evidence-ledPrimary sources wherever possible.
TransparentCorrections and review dates stay visible.
Non-partisanNo candidate or party endorsements.
Citizen-firstBuilt around the questions citizens ask.
Explore the desk

Three ways to get the facts

Myth Buster

Check a viral claim

Search claims by topic and see what evidence supports, contradicts or leaves a question unresolved.

Browse checks →
Verified News

Read source-backed updates

Short public-interest explainers that identify their sources, dates, context and remaining uncertainty.

Open the news desk →
Media literacy

Learn how we verify

See the six-step method behind every check, so you can inspect the reasoning and apply it to what you see online.

Read the method →
The process

From viral post to visible evidence

Read methodology
01

Identify

Capture the exact claim and preserve the original source.

02

Investigate

Trace primary documents, dates, context and independent corroboration.

03

Review

A second reviewer checks whether the evidence supports the wording.

04

Publish

Explain the finding clearly, with sources and corrections where needed.

Take part

See something suspicious?

Citizen claim submissions are opening soon. Until then, check our Myth Buster first — and for suspected election-related disinformation, use the official Real411 reporting channel.

Our boundaries

We show the evidence. You make the choice.

We don't tell citizens who to vote for. We don't treat disagreement as proof of falsehood. We don't publish accusations without evidence.

Political opinions, predictions and rhetoric are distinct from checkable factual claims.